who were planning to return to the table.
This is where the
No voters royally fecked up. There was
never going to be a 'return to the table' the day after a No vote, or a week, or month after. This was very clear...didn't they believe what they were told?
If those who voted No didn't believe what they were being told then
they were not negotiating in good faith...'good faith' essentially means trust.
Why did they vote
NO...because AIPA
and AFAP said to?
How many
NO voters explored
why AIPA/AFAP recommended that course of action?