I dont know how this will work.
Already we hear bicourtney is unable to provide sufficient terminal passes for the three airlines operating out of MMA2.
we hear they have started issuing temporary passes,and are threatening users of those temporary passes for having them.
We understand some airline personnel have been detained in confined areas for as much as three hours,because they have only been issued temporary passes in MMA2 by FAAN officers, even though FAAN and bicourtney officials are aware they are bonafide authourised operational personnel.
No recourse to a lawyer,police not involved,and this is unacceptable.
Private sector participation is supposed to lure investors,not force them kicking and screaming into a forced contractual agreement.
How will they cope with VK and Arik personnel that number in the hundreds if they cannot cope with what they are presently trying to manage?
Does it make sense to populate key management positions with ex civil servants, and not expect beureaucracy gone mad mentality to be the order of the day,which now appears to be the norm within MMA2.
Chaichangi found their charges unreasonable and relocated operations to old domestic airport.
premium car park which gives direct access to the terminal cordoned off from use,for lack of receipts at automatic barrier access control system.
preboarded area has a low standard catering facility with empty office spaces so over priced no company with responsible financial outlook can consider leasing them.
No internet wireless facilities for travellers,insufficient power points for todays business traveller who has to energise phones and laptops.
Why the denial of the IATA report or observation on the terminal?
Any lay man can see that the terminal is not properly constructed with finishing improperly done in many parts of the terminal.
They need to get their act together now,or they will find failure just around the corner.
Last edited by AVSEC; 5th Feb 2008 at 05:46.