I take it SAS means Goodrich is modifying the valve design. While this probably is not "a major design flaw in the aircraft", surely this, if true, means that not everything can be blamed on SAS maintenance?
Well said! I do strongly believe that it is a combined problem.....
But to make statments such as, "
SAS flew dangerous planes for years", without any final report is wrong!
If I were a BBD employee working on the Q400, I would be super upset! Remeber that Goodrich makes the landing gears, not BBD.
So far SAS is the only one complaining, makes you wonder?
Really? I thought they have been silent.....according to the article, SAS has refused to comment. It's the Danish media that has been looking for somebody to crap on.
Are you serious??? Talk about a loaded statement....
Please, show me one Canadian report which makes definate claims prior to a final report?
Does anybody know where I can find the writer's email address for the article? Sorry don't know the language...