PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - RACWA
Thread: RACWA
View Single Post
Old 11th Jan 2008, 00:09
  #20 (permalink)  
FRQ Charlie Bravo
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MR

PPL can only sign the MR for that flight. CPL signature is valid all day
I digress:

SPL signature is valid for one hour and ATPL signature is valid all week.

Now if it's for NVFR then the DI is valid for 2 hours for a NVFR pilot but if a MECIR pilot signs the MR it is valid all night (and until first light despite the fact that its a new day). However if said MECIR pilot is not current but holds a NVFR then it's only valid for 2 hours unless co-signed by a LAME with at least a PPL.

Let us not forget that CAO 88.1.0 Para 78.6(r) (limited distribution) specifies that:

"If said aircraft has tailwheel undercarriage then [all the above] applies with the additional condition that it be well understood that any self-respecting CPL/ATPL who actually re-signs after a perfectly entitled and licenced PPL:
a) march directly across the road (without looking either way before crossing) and
b) find the nearest Pilot Licence holder (not being the holder of a Student Pilot Licence) and
C) declare himself/herself a total uu@nker and
D) pull down his/her dacks and prepare for the cane.


A word of warning, from my reading of the CARs an Offence against CAO 88.1.0 Para 78.6(r) substitutes a breach of Strict Liability (refer to the Criminal Code).

Hey, don't blame me I don't write the rules, I just make them up as I go to suit myself.

Last edited by FRQ Charlie Bravo; 11th Jan 2008 at 01:09. Reason: naughty word back in (kinda); and fix grammar
FRQ Charlie Bravo is offline