So maybe it's time a few of you climbed down of your high horses and cut TD some slack as there is high probability that he did not actually say what was printed and what ever he did say was then printed in a context guaranteed to whip the chattering classes into a frenzy
Sorry SFFP but TD has been on these forums since the first
and second articles were printed by the DR. In the absence of any rapid denials, unlike those by Ms Beattie, we might assume that the quotations and story have a grain of truth. If they are incorrect, why not an outright denial? Either way it has left a nasty taste - perhaps a simple "no comment" to the DR would have been much more appropriate. One can only hope that, like Ms Beattie, TD has apologised to OC 120 and we can also hope that the DR does so as well -
publicly and prominently!!