SH
A Safety Case is not responsible for anything. Responsibiity and Authority is vested in people, not paper. The responsibility for the Safety Case lies with the IPTL and the RTSA. See JSP553 for details.
The Nimrod Safety Case has been actively discussed on here for some time, and certainly long before the findings of the BOI were announced.
Why did the aircrew and groundcrew know nothing of the Safety Case ? Part of the wider problem I'm afraid. see the other Nimrod thread for the discussion.
S_H
The part in red, have no idea what you're saying there.
The Safety case was one of the policies in place which was given as being at fault. The Groundcrew and Aircrew knew nothing of it as at no time were any of them consulted with regards to potential hazards on the planes which they fly and worked on. Yes all this is part of the wider problem which is why there are to be reviews in policy, and a further inquiry with possibly a public inquiry, which will investigate this.
The fact that individual hazards were recorded by the safety case, and yet at no time was that information correlated to show the hazard as a whole shows a massive failing in the policies of the safety case.
Something which Cannard or any others at ISK had nothing to do with.
Shona, don't worry about it honey, I know that if you had something to say, you'd be the one at the front of the room doing most of the talking but you'd be doing it to him
