That would suit me fine BEagle...the only thing I'd say though is that I can imagine what the other member countries who are against the IMC rating might say:
(if the suggested IMC course is too short) 'that's not good enough, it will just cause people to do things they can't really handle' or if it's too long...'what's the point? They might as well do the IR.'
A balance has to be struck (and we all know that) and the IMC rating as it stands does need some alteration (as DFC, rustle, bose and all the others have said). For example if it is taken in a single...it shouldn't be valid in a multi.
I like BEagle's proposed syllabus.