We have just had a chat with AMP and the staish. Not much was actually said except that the original Aircrew Review which apparently did include AA was tri-service and was therefore a compromise all along the way. At any time any service could effectively red card any propositions being made which is what happened to us, either the Navy and/or the Army vetoed AA being in the last review. Thus we got nothing at all! Our latest review is also to be tri-service so whatever is suggested by the RAF review team has to get pass the Army and Navy as well as the treasury! And from the way the AMP was talking it seemed that there will be no distinction between AA just as none was made between OA. So if we're not short of ALMs and not desperately short of AEs then it won't matter that AEOps are few on the ground! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="frown.gif" />