Bulbs,
points noted, as mentioned in previous post only reason I drew parallel is that both were/are prepared to in warkmans words "destroy the company" in order to achieve to receive equal/similar remuneration/terms in comparison to those in equivalent roles with different employers.
However for one party to do it it was acceptable and for the other it is not. This is what I do not understand - or did the pilots cop as much flak from other departments when they were about to strike, I wasnt a pruner then
So those not in favour of striking and whilst I acknowledge the two scenarios are very different you have nothing to worry about then if it is such a minority prepared to strike right ?