Good reply! I do agree with TFM-why would you want to keep somebody who obviously has problems during LT, unless special circumstances are a factor (i.e irregular schedule, lack of airplanes (FR), lack of LT-captains and so on)?! It would be very costly for the operators.
In comparison with other LCC:s NAS seems solid, nice to work 4 with an approachable (good word!) management (not like...hmmm... FR perhaps..?) and I can't blame them for requiring a completed type rating previous to employment-seems to be fairly standard among the LCCs. It's all about the benjamins!
From what I understand NAS has a different way of conducting their interviews and rely heavily on "in-house" recommendations. On the contrary they are very demanding during courses and LT which might concur with Guttn's argumentation. There are many ways to skin a cat!
Wish ya'll a nice weekend and happy flying!
Diss.