it is ok to try and dismiss someone of more than 30 years standing over a trivial amount
It speaks volumes about the common-sense levels and intellect of some of the blue-collar rabble ranting and raving here that they can't see the irony in attacking Qantas for unlawfully dismissing an employee from the group they see as part of their problem while enthusiastically attempting to discriminate between someone who put in 30 years and "forgot" he had a pocket-full of chockies and someone who put in one, two or five years and "forgot" he had a pocket-full of chockies.
The militant boiler lot looking after themselves? I guess so.
Aren't you about 60yo and "retired", lowerLube? Don't you think you're a little old to be carrying on like you do here?