Who's bright idea was it to situate this on stand 12?
The temp fencing has only been up a few days yet is already causing airfield ops/handling agents considerable headaches.
Totally agree that the back gates need better passenger facilities but
surely the correct sequence was new stands first
then new lounge?
I have yet to catch a glimpse of the construction plans for the project but would wager a considerable amount of (someone elses) money that there will be a retail opportunity housed therein
