Originally Posted by Chicken Leg
That's my point, it was primarily designed as a sub hunter and yet there aren't any subs to hunt (that matter anyway, and certainly not for the rediculous price we're paying).
If in 15-20 years time we are still only worried about stroppy ragheads, I, for one, will be very happy. Look North East and a long way East young man and if that doesnt make you very nervous, your optician will be delighted to see you.
Originally Posted by Chicken Leg
My main gripe is the amount of money that is being spent on a largely redundant requirment and on a 60 year old platform
I think you exagerate the age of the machine, somewhat. We are talking Nimrods from Comets here; not Shackletons from Lincolns (don't let's be silly and pretend Manchesters). The broad GA may fit a Comet but the only commonality is the fuselage, fin and tail plane.
Throughout the latter stages of this Thread, there is no credible indication what the current setback is. Is there any danger of someone with some
knowledge providing a clue?