The NPPL was set up at the request of industry and the NPPL Policy and Steering Committee consists of representatives from all the organisations stated previously.
All these organisations represent the views and interests of their members. We have had much robust debate in committee to recommend improvements to the NPPL; the difference between last time (when the CAA introduced policies without the committee having had the chance to check them) and this time is that this time we have been working with the CAA to ensure that proposed changes will have been agreed by the whole committee.
We'd hoped to launch the proposals last year, but needed to resolve 2 issues (the ANO wording describing the supervisory requirements for Microlight AFIs and the ANO wording describing the medical declaration requirements). These have now been resolved.
Who do you expect to host, manage and pay for some internet discussion forum? if you want to comment on the ANO amendment proposals, you will need to ask your representative organisation for further details. If you don't belong to an organisation such as AOPA, BBGA, BGA, BMAA, GAPAN or the PFA then perhaps you should consider doing so? Then they can represent your views.