When ever someone 'jumps out' of a Fast Jet an enquiry into the circumstances and causes is convened with a view to preventing the same accident reoccurring. In the mean time some meaningful debate will take place within the FJ brethren often within these forums. It seams that any meaningful debate in this case consists of statements of the ilk 'get a life', 'close this thread' (sweep it under the carpet?) and 'Grow up'. An interesting comparison. Further, I would have thought that the fact that the Martin Baker option is denied to both crew and passengers aboard At assets is all the more reason to avoid accidents such as this in the first place. Or perhaps you are happy relying on divine intervention Mr ExVicar?
Look after number 1, nobody else will.
Fly Safe
B