Lots to go on here.
Driver Airframe dinks a jet as reported above, will there be a Human Factors element to the enquiry? Some comments with regard to stretch, minimum quals etc (also above somewhere) should give rise to concerns about the wider implications.
Mover dinks jet, again there should be an enquiry which should also take HF into account - how long on shift, trained, supervised, briefed etc etc etc.
Its the baddies job to dink the jets - not ours. (paraphrased from CAS HF brief).
'We' are now working our people harder, for longer periods, under greater pressure - both intrinsic (self imposed) and extrinsic (imposed by others) - than we have for many years. The risks we run are assessed and should be accepted at an appropriate level. Is once a year often enough to 'sign' for orders?
Should we not be looking for solutions and remedies rather than blame and disgruntlement?
Lets not do the enemies job for them.