Permafrost wrote: "I'm glad there is a logical explanation ;-)"
Yep...it's not my fault ;-)
No, but seriously the reason for my attitude is that I believe that we're not applying the correct minima in some cases. We always (at least to my understanding) use the 50 RA for CATIIIa which I believe is wrong.
As in my example of a CATII minima of 105 RA, I presume the CATIIIa would be higher than 50, perhaps 55...
I believe J.O. has the answer for my case.
(Seat1APlease: Of course we carry plates for unforeseen diversions enroute..."emergency bricks" which we in normal ops don't open. BTW did you know that seat 1a has the highest death potentional in a crash?
)