managements arbitrary interpretation of rules
That is their “Right to Manage”. One day this interpretation, next day that interpretation. Just depends on how it works for them on the day.
Unfortunately, the two pilots are been made examples.
Just demonstrates that Cathay Pacific Airways preferred method of discipline is “Termination”. Termination is justified from “throwing peanuts” to “working to rule”.
Why do we have Discipline and Grievance procedure? It is rarely used. Was it used in this case?
Just a reminder, giving up a job in your home country for Cathay Pacific Airways can end at any moment.