not from me. My issue was to do with a STOP! Call and a possible false STOP!
You're correct! Considering that this topic was originally about "botched landings", we've deviated considerably from that subject.
I'm also amazed that you have 'about 8' items for a ?mandatory? High-speed stop.
Remember my qualifying statement. "...I’m going to use the Generic Airbus Flight Crew Training Manual FCTM as an example..." And, that manual indicates 8 items that should be considered for a "Stop". Refer to [FCTM 03.020]
By the way, I can’t seem to find the word “Mandatory” in my previous posting.
9 times out of 10 it is better to GO with most failures.
Remember what I said, "...There isn’t a pilot anywhere that doesn’t understand that a Rejected Take-off is a potentially hazardous manoeuvre….continuing the take-off is the much safer choice...."
Would you not be better having a computer make the stop decision in that case?
Very interesting thought, and maybe not too far outside the realms of possibility. Let’s face it, in the Airbus, this is done to some extent with the inclusion of “Take-off inhibited" warnings.
A difficult and critical time for decisions, so make them easy and train the crews accordingly.
Again, my previous comments "
...if we have failed in the CRM aspect (RTO briefing) ... may not understand ....at a time when they truly should. But, if they do understand, the likelihood of someone – inadvertently - calling “Stop” after V1 is greatly reduced.
I assume that we are, in fact, singing from the same sheet of music.