Originally Posted by BOAC
The 'serious' part of this thread is back on R&N if anyone wishes to add serious comment to it.
True? or not true?
It appears to have been tucked away out of sight in the wholly inappropriate "spotters" corner.
This is not a 'planespotting' issue at all. It's a serious safety issue.
If we are to abolish Rule 65 (5), as appears to be the proposition, then it is something whiuch ought to be allowed to be discussed seriously, not merely sneered at and thrown away into "Spotters corner" in denial of the importance public safety issues.
EDIT: OK OK! The big boss decided this is where it should be. His train set, as they say. If you feel strongly about this please use the contacts listed in post #6 which has been only partly quoted here by LF.