I think it is sad that some contributors feel it appropriate to call into doubt the integrity of others.
I'm not sure exactly to what this refers to. But in my own mind, I must see confirmation from the CAA before I accept anybodies word on the subject that contradicts my training and the apparent alignment of my training with the wording in the AIP. It isn't a matter of integrity, it could be a matter of interpretation, a matter of how the questions was phrased or anything that I can't think of right now. I still haven't received a reply BTW.