since this is the last time that balpa were faced with a direct clash of 2 pilot groups interests i think it would be difficult to say balpa sided with the ba groups interests!
Yeah, right!!!!!
Try telling that to the BRAL/BACX/BACON pilots who were in the same position as the CityFlyer guys.
Try mentioning their pensions - a much much smaller deficit, (less than 1% I understand) of the NAPS deficit, but did we or do we or will we get any advice or assistance?
[That question was rhetorical by the way, responses by HandSolo and Twinrotor head will be predictable, these so-called colleagues like so many mainliners are only interested in themselves, and
their union.]
We shall all sink or swim together on this one, and by not supporting their , oh let's get it right,
"Wholly owned Company" colleagues. They will reap what they sow.
