That is true Blueloo I think the point is well made that the 767 is a strong machine but then so is a DC 3.
However, cartexchange’s point is that they are a pain for the customer
The 767 interior is a tired piece of equipment and unsuitable for modern seating and comfort as well as IFE unless you cut back on seat numbers and it should be put out to rest.
The company is showing it’s contempt towards it’s customers by operating these as well as it’s sardine configured airbus’s .
The company offered the even more tired 300 classic on the NRT flights and now the punters will have to endure 767’s until the 787 is delivered…very poor really..
PEGASUS..my recollection must have been close to the mark then about who ok'ed the Thai base.
You keep telling us that you think we should be flexible and...as well you are now telling us that the faaa did negotiate with the company in regard to the LHR base
Can you tell us then how the faaa will be pro active in dealing with the company instead of reactive 101% of the time
I'm also interested to hear that you think that the faaa mounted an effective media campaign..I'd hate to see what you consider an ineffective campaign
Last edited by lowerlobe; 23rd January 2006 at 01:26.