PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - ATC Bias
Thread: ATC Bias
View Single Post
Old 23rd Sep 2005, 22:50
  #12 (permalink)  
Going Boeing
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,873
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Boree 3

I wasn't making an accusation of bias, I was arguing a case against its existance.

The sequence for the Boree 3 STAR was a domestic aircraft for 34R, my flight for 34L, CX (A330) for 34L followed by another domestic aircraft for 34R. To achieve this sequence, CX (2000' below and 3 miles in front) was vectored east of the STAR track before rejoining the STAR in sequence behind us. I have observed this happen before which is why I believe that Maestro still has flaws and should be used in a "ghost" mode rather than as an active ATC tool.

DeBurcs

Good points. I was trying to say (in brief) that I appreciated the fact that the CX crew did not whinge over the airways.

SM4 Pirate

Thanks, I was unaware that Maestro is not used for sequencing into CNS.

haughtney 1

As well as France, Singapore ATC is well known for giving the local carrier express service at the expense of everyone else - even to the extent of training aircraft getting priority over RPT.
Going Boeing is offline