What WWW is objecting to - and I agree - is lying about it.
Why dont we read what is written.
www said no training fixes without a fi aboard in response to which their was universal dissent. No one supports lieing when seriously lost.
www is a fi and yet argues an important safety procedure should not be routinely rehersed in spite of the caps. In my book that is the real worry. We should perhaps question the training of fis
