After the outrageous refusal of BASSA to grant BA the "disruption agreement" and their pathetic attempt to defend illegal and job threatening secondry strike action, it would appear that many of their members are turning against them
From the horses keyboard
If this doesn't get sorted out I'm joing CC89
Bassa should immediately and fully justify why the disruption agreement is not in place. I don't believe they are speaking for the majority of their members here by any means
But really, what good will come from our drivers and baggage handlers going on strike? GG aren't suddenly going to think "we must withdraw the dismissals or BA will be stuck".
yeah, but us going on strike isn't going to get them their jobs back, it just loses us ours instead!
I'm ashamed to be a BASSA member after that announcement.
Can anyone justify to me why we should not have actioned the disruption agreement?
Maybe the lunatics haven't quite got the support they think they have.
Still I'm sure Mr Walsh is watching BASSA's comments with interest.