Why was CVT left out of this?
Provisional Section 106 limiting pax to 0.98 mil per year until a new agreement is made for the permanent terminal?
CVT is not without its problems, but still has plenty more room for growth yet - and as for catchment areas, there is probably more population within 120 mins than almost all of the cities above combined - would probably have to leave DSA out of it, I wouldn't want to provoke its supporters, especially as there are so many of them.