Is it just me or does anyone else think that if (and i hope to god we do) have an uneventful few years post the Sea Jet with regards to the defence of the fleet that some thrusting budget holder nearing 2012 is not just going to turn around and say
"well we've managed without organic AD of the fleet for six years why do we need to spend all this money on a role that we haven't needed for the past six years?"
Surely that is the worst result that could come out of the loss of the bumper fun jet and it's current capabilities!!
