This seems to prove that the migration of mandarins from the ATO to CASA is well and truly under way. Only someone familiar with something as complex as our tax legislation could POSSIBLY have come up with such a Byzantine proposal.
I would rather try to decode the Rosetta Stone than attempt to understand this... For me, and I suspect for others, BHA = Permanent No Fly Zone if this scheme goes ahead.
And with all those alleged breaches, isn't there some likelihood of a court case with penalties to be applied if found against the subject? Why, then, would CASA be considering bending over backwards for the same (allegedly) dodgy operator?
Baffling...
VHCU