Insider 107
I lost you here. When your marine friend came to the quick conclusion that Rockhounds postings were c**p you apparently vehemently
remonstrated with him as you thought he was erroneous. But, he stood firm and then you said, ok, I am now going to write a cogent and complete refutation on Rockhounds posts.
What happened? X-Ray vision?
Anyway, standing by for your revelations.
Back to the topic.
It seems to me that the discussion is concentrating on the SIA culture/ethnics issue, which could be a contributing factor in this accident.
What was the primary factor and, the secundary? Chain of thoughts;
Aircraft hit object. Why was object there.
How came aircraft on collision path with object. Why was object not visable for crew. And then comes the culture aspect.Why did capt. decide to leave the gate. etc. It is contributing, not primary.
[This message has been edited by AEROVISION (edited 03 March 2001).]