SERCO are only after 1 thing, and have been from day 1, and that is the airports side of NATS, which still makes a profit. They can smell a bargain, and NATS might be willing to sell to reduce their borrowing. . .With the airports side it gives them the reputation and kudos to go and win the big contracts. However, because of monopoly restrictions they will be forced to break up the new business by selling on much of the old side. . .So the people making most of the noise about how good SERCO are will be having new employers as well. And which side has the industrial muscle to defend their terms and conditions the best?