I would personally employ a person who has gone further, (using whichever method), to obtain the knowledge required to get a job. It shows determination to succeed
And if I had 2 candidates under consideration, and I knew one had gone out and researched their preparation themselves and the other had simply paid someone............I know which one I would employ.
If so many pass the aptitude tests then why do they fail? Surely if the aptitude testing is that good then students would not fail.
Come off it. That is just grasping at straws. There are so many variables in the training process from day one right up to validation day, it is a foolish question indeed. And infact, one could even point you statement at what you propose. Your little business may get people through the application process and a seat in the college...............hmmmm.
You're beginning to talk in circles here. It's been established on several occasions that up till now applicants have prepared themselves. From some of the PMs and emails I personally have recieved, these people are already highly motivated and not just doing the bare minimum. Even reading through some of the threads that appear here, they have a desire to achieve their aspiration of attaining a training slot. You have admitted viewing your whole enterprise as a business you want to make a quick buck from. You keep waving this "higher quality" applicant flag. That is an insult to anybody who had already gone through the process off their own back and achieved what they set their sights on......themselves.