What 'possible increased risk'? According to the figures Oz' CASA used to analyse the safety of light piston twins (ie non-transport cat/FAR25/whatever.)vs SET the demonstrated, fatality & injury rates were at least equivalent to the twins, and in some areas better. This was based on what had been achieved in service, not some hypothetical prognosis.
So, again, how can you call it an increased risk?
Blody tipos...
Last edited by Tinstaafl; 12th November 2004 at 23:49.