Woomera,
No, the company is not obliged to justify itself here.
In the interests of fairness, they should at least be given the opportunity. Had you killed the thread when you stated you wished to, you would have effectivly removed their right of reply.
There could be any number of reasons the crews at this company got this brief.
If you are concerned that the company has been named, edit the thread. Or at least refrain from naming them yourself.
If the thread is as baseless as you suggest, then kill it.
Why do you seem touchy about this one?
Currawong. I'm no more "touchy" about NAC than I am about any other AOC holder being criticised in PPRuNe. I am sympathetic to any employee who is being deprived of his just remuneration, regardless of who that operator is.
I'm not getting the basic fundamental across:
If the staff of any AOC holder in NT or ACT, or any AOC holder roped in under the Award are not being paid in accordance with an Award or a registered AWA, they have a remedy at law.
That remedy is not allegations in PPRuNe - I have already provided links to the appropriate agencies.
I have received numerous emails on this thread - more than any thread for some time - however none of the emails appear to be from NAC staff.
Woomera
[email protected]