currawong. I see no reason why NAC should justify it's actions to any person or group other than it's own staff and those authorities authorised to investigate allegations or complaints made by staff.
m-dot. What dispute?
The employees of NAC have an appropriate remedy
if ....
if they are being disadvantaged - and I see no
substantial and proven facts in this thread to confirm this is the case.
NAC are not obliged to justify their actions in PPRuNe, rather if any NAC employee feels he is disadvantaged their remedy is via
DEWR or
OEA.
Threads of this nature are regularly removed from PPRuNe forums, however I will leave this thread open for now. If any derogatory posts are made regarding NAC, it's Managing Director or it's staff which are contrary to PPRuNe rules, the post (or thread) will be removed and user's access rights may be restricted.
Woomera