You are correct, and yes one would think such based on the report. contrary to this I do feel I had sufficient experience/familiarity with the airframe. With that said in terms of training for this particular situation I am yet to find a training regime for this aircraft that includes a scenario involving this particular system purely because of the fact that it is basically never touched. In terms of pre-flight flows it is included which is something I always check but in air it is the last thing one thinks of because of its location. In terms of indications, post emergency situation there was no clear indications that this was the issue. Irrespective of all this yes I made a mistake and I think the entire decision making process that lead to this situation was flawed. Its a tough situation because while I would very much like to defend myself from the harshness of this report which I do not necessarily agree with, this most likely will be viewed as trying to shift blame or to not take accountability which is absolutely not what my intention is. I take responsibility for it, the buck stopped with me and my decision lead to this. From what you are saying I just have to be brutally honest and show how my decision making has changed post the accident and just hope for the best.
Thank you for your insight. I appreciate it.