Well, I stick with what I said.
Navigation leg two has been substantially reduced by many examiners as the workload required during that leg has been reduced by the reshuffle in the test profile.
The navigation has been assessed on leg one. No need to repeat it. No need to waste flight time at the candidates expense.
The profile does NOT require positive I.D. of both places - examiner MAY elect to carry out the diversion BEFORE getting to the nominated destination, so how the **** does the candidate positively identify it??
Where the difference in modular and integrated?? I didn't say there was - I said OXFORD has mandated IN THEIR SYLLABUS that the candidate identifies both places. They (Oxford) have also mandated IN THE SYLLABUS that the test should take two hours thirty minutes, whereas a modular guy (or, in theory, any other integrated candidate whose company syllabus does not dictate otherwise) need only fly as long as is required to jump through each and every hoop on the list of MANDATORY items.
The abnormal/emergency section do not REQUIRE a systems failure or whatever - it is OPTIONAL at the discretion of the examiner.....but a damned good idea.
I'll grant you, BJ, that the "IMC checks" should be carried out almost as you say - but this may involve a DESCENT to MSA, not just a climb.
I also say again - read Standards Document 3 (although it, alone, does not suggest that you may use RNAV to support your divert planning).