Originally Posted by
Uplinker
Our SOPs had PF make an independent check of which engine had failed before ordering ECAM actions for engine failure*. Your SOPs have that independent check after ordering ECAM actions.
The point is, we agree that an independent check and confirmation of which engine has failed must be made by PF instead of them blindly trusting that PM has got it right.
So for the OP; the PF does not just fly the 'plane in their own little bubble; they are very closely involved with the ECAM process - in fact they command the ECAM process. So there is no "wall".
*Our SOPs - which were Airbus SOPs with a few extras - then also required confirmation of correct thrust lever, master switch, and fire PB as well.
.
I fully agree.
EBT shows us there are multiple ways to reach a safe and efficient goal, this is the big change with the old school training where people were taught tasks rather then competencies.
Hence any way of proceeding between the crew that enhances safety is always welcome.