Originally Posted by
megan
From the accident report REDL. My take away is the reticence to use the aircraft may very well be the inability to show what was the initiator of the failure.The use of "could not be determined", "likely", "possibility" do not engender confidence.
True. Except that REDL was not an EC225. Quite similar? - yes. Identical ? No. Cockpit epicyclic chip detector light being one difference.