PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Senate vote against Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee inquiry
Old 10th Feb 2024, 09:34
  #6 (permalink)  
MickG0105
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,215
Received 233 Likes on 112 Posts
The original motion, put by Senator Rice, was
That the following matter be referred to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 8 October 2024:

The impact and mitigation of aircraft noise on residents and business in capital cities and regional towns, with particular reference to:

(a) the effect of aircraft noise on amenity, physical and mental wellbeing and everyday life of residents;

(b) the effect of aircraft noise on small business;

(c) any proposals for the mitigation and limitation of aircraft noise, including flight curfews, changes to flight paths and alternatives to air travel;

(d) any barriers to the mitigation and limitation of aircraft noise; and

(e) any other related matters.
Mademoiselle Sports Rorts then sought to amend the original motion,

Omit all words after "That", substitute

"the following matters be referred to the Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry and report by 8 October 2024:

(a) The impact, regulation and mitigation of aircraft noise on residents and business in our communities, including the impacts of aircraft noise on amenity, physical and mental wellbeing and everyday life of affected communities; and

(b) Australia's airspace management, operation and regulation to ensure the safety, efficiency and sustainability of the aviation industry, with particular reference to:

(i) the adequacy and effectiveness of Australia's airspace management operation and regulation in meeting the needs of the aviators and communities,

(ii) skills shortages, job vacancies and access to skills training in the aviation sector,

(iii) aircraft noise management practices and their effectiveness in mitigating impacts on communities,

(iv) factors contributing to on-time performance issues across Australian airspace,

(v) the safety and reliability of airspace management across rural and regional Australia, and

(vi) any other related matters".
McKenzie's proposed amendment, which would have had the effect of tacking a review of Airservices Australia onto the original noise review, was defeated. Rice's original motion on aircraft noise was agreed to. No prizes for guessing why Labor don't want the Committee getting stuck into AsA.
MickG0105 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by MickG0105: