Why do you think he should lose his pension?
Should everyone who does a naughty thing at work lose their pension?
As it appears from the information, in previous parts of this thread, that he may have obtained his post in the Constabulary through a somewhat embellished C.V. it seems a fair point that had he not embellished his life, he would not have been entitled to access the pension scheme in the first place, at which point there then appears another argument that the accumulation of said pension from the local taxpayer was carried out fraudulently.
It's not a blanket argument that everybody who is naughty at work should lose their pension, even as a result of an ops clerk encounter, but my 2 cents is that in some circumstances it does appear a reasonably equitable punishment