Originally Posted by
43Inches
Yeah whatever you reckon, never said they were run apart, the 35 second delay was added last, again after it was interjected that the initial runs were not realistic. Not sure what you are arguing but it makes no sense.
Wasn't it you who said "
the initial simulator exercises lent weight to their argument after 7 of 13 attempts landed successfully at La Guardia, it was only after it was argued that there needed to be a 'startle' delay added to the simulations that it was proved that any attempt to return to land was not the right course", or was it someone else who goes by the name of "43Inches"? Whatever the case, it's total bull
that repeats the nonsense portrayed in the movie.
Mick's comment makes perfect sense to anyone who has actually read and understood the simulator evaluation report that was released by the NTSB. The evaluation was conducted over a three-day period, with the 35-second delay introduced on day two. The delay runs were conducted after the no-delay runs to reduce the total number of runs required. There was simply no point repeating runs with a 35-second delay when it had already been shown that an immediate turn back was unsuccessful.