Its approach is the same as to all 'issues': Interpret it to be 'aero-medically significant', exaggerate the risks to a potential aviation disaster, google up whatever is the 'Rolls Royce' method of dealing with the worst-possible case, inflict that on the guinea pig, no matter the costs and risks to the guinea pig and - most appallingly - despite the opinions of medical professionals with actual expertise in the area and knowledge of the particular person. Then spend months gathering information for input to the solemn deliberations of a 'complex case management meeting' - which is actually an echo chamber of people who've mistaken their positions of power for superior medical expertise - all the while being insouciantly indifferent to the impact on the guinea pig - that is, after all, what guinea pigs are for.
In short: They approach it in the same way as any idiot with access to the internet and a messianic belief that they're the last bastion between aviation safety and carnage would approach it.
Last edited by Clinton McKenzie; 1st Oct 2023 at 00:19.