Originally Posted by
eglnyt
If £100M blows your mind heaven knows what will happen when you find out that NATS has spent an average of more than that every year for the last 10 years.
It’s not the £10m-100m price tag the incumbents need to ‘get out bed’, that’s being spent every year as has been said.
It’s the ‘£90m out of £100m that is being wasted’ which shows you how dire the situation is; there is literally no accountability (as the Board ‘can’t even spell IT’!) so it just degenerates from there.