Originally Posted by
eglnyt
As I said those made redundant faired quite well but voluntary is an interesting term. NATS had served notice that it was going to unilaterally withdraw the relatively good redundancy scheme. In mid 2020 it looked quite possible that income would not recover and redundancies would be required further down the track possibly on far worse terms. Many jumped because of that. Others realised that if a lot of people jumped they would be left in an under resourced organisation that wouldn't be a nice place to be.
Hahahahaha - under resourced?! And voluntary means all (bar one) volunteers. No compulsory redundancies were made, despite the spin at the time (and clearly now), sorry, but this is turning into fantasy cover up.