Originally Posted by
Neo380
Whereas putting proper fail safes in place, as would be the case in other mission critical systems, does properly manage the problem - but that’s the point NATS is very keen to avoid discussing.
You seem to be interpreting the silence so far as avoiding discussion. That may be the case but from previous experience a lot of detailed work needs to happen to prepare the background material before you can start the discussion. In this case there appear to be external parties involved and possibly suppliers and you have to give them time an opportunity to prepare their responses as well. How many organisations do you know that can lay their hands on 20 year records quickly?