QUOTE=SimonK;11493595]
well said.[/QUOTE]
calm down lads. The contract is signed . Smash and grab complete. I’m only asking a question about the work enviro of a 189 v 92 for the Tech crew. Considering the money , research and design put into the front end it’s a legitimate concern about the back of the aircraft. Door size is one thing but cabin roof height and cubic space available has to be considered . Stick 17 in the back then the size of the door might be a worry when some of your survivors on the floor unrestrained in close proximity to a large open door. Never mind trying to actually treat anyone injured. Again this is what IRCG asked for and this is what they scored. It’s obvious they wanted change so Bristow has a customer ripe for picking but it appears that IRCG has no one on the team from a medical or Technical crew back ground . So it’s all new tech with lots of new stuff and sure we don’t know what we are looking at but it looks good. No doubt they rated this scenario as high impact low likelihood, we’ll get away with it and hopefully be retired before it happens .
So my question still stands for someone to answer who has both 92 and 189 experience as a technical aircrew member. How’s the body holding up?