Originally Posted by
Gunner747400
It's rather comical that you think the reason that clause would be removed would be because they think it is going to cause the company to go broke. I think you'll find it had much more sinister IR reasons behind it (considering it was the first EBA post NJS merging into the QF group).
Any way I am done debating this, we clearly have different ideological views on how IR problems should be handled, and no point going around in circles.
Agreed. There’s little point to endless debate. Best of luck to us all, may the right result prevail.