Originally Posted by
Lookleft
Right so we vote for something based on airframes that haven't even arrived and history has shown are often deferred or cancelled. The LRs seem to be doing CNS returns and the XLRs are due when? Keith you very publicly highlight the problem with the AFAP. No willingness to work with anyone else and an arrogance that makes Putin look like Forrest Gump. You lost a lot of people during that ridiculous PIA that cost the pilots 3% from 2020 and you now just assume that because the AFAP has decreed the pilots will follow. Put it to the vote then and see what your constituents think. After all you should be doing this for the benefit of all the pilots and not just the WA cabal.
Layover highline is worth 1% to narrowbody pilots on current layover hours, and 3% to widebody pilots on current layover hours. Most reasonable pilots can see layover hours are increasing at Jetstar. You wanted the iPad agreement back which would put everyone behind at least 3%. Vote NO if you think the LR's and XLR's aren't coming, or vote NO if you think they will be doing shark patrol up and down the east coast. I don't care why you want to vote NO, but I do want to know what your plan is if this agreement gets voted down.
Lookleft, do you even work for Jetstar?
What is it you want?
What are you going to do to get it?
You criticize the AFAP's PIA, yet have no logical plan for voting this agreement down. What is going to make the company give more? A sternly worded PA and red tie campaign?