Originally Posted by
212man
It’s similar to “can’t be bothered to read earlier posts” culture.
On the contrary, I’ve read and followed this thread from start to finish and was aware of the original selfie claim👍. I posted earlier (#154) about that rumour/story having been retracted by the authorities, hence my question (which in hindsight probably looks like more of a challenge than a question) as to why reference to that false story had been resurrected.
Apologies if I wasn’t clear with that question, it was poorly worded. I assumed others would have read the thread and seen #154 before resurrecting the selfie reference.